If you go to the link below you will find a video on tailwheel rigging that might help you understand why too tight will cause you more issues than to loose, as for the compression springs vs. expansion type springs it is a matter of preference on your part. Both work it is just a different feel in the peddles. If you run too tight of tension you risk bending parts internal to the TW and also you are adding alot of wear to the rudder bushings that is not needed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u3qFwzPNBgE
http://www.youtube.com/user/Maule10Y.../0/QtokU8mIDQk
Last edited by Wup Winn; 05-24-2010 at 01:30 PM.
Thanks Royce. I'll probably get in touch with Becky and get the parts on the way. I have # 102 and my buddy has #109 so we'll probably do them together. I've flown #109 and the tail wheel steers poorly just like mine. Must be typical of all the sports w/ 3200. One very noticable difference is the smoothness of 109 compared to my plane #102. Could it be prop ballance or perhaps a more serious issue? It has never changed or gotten any worse or better. the difference between the two is dramatic. can this prop be ballanced? Where to get it ballanced? Should it have been ballanced from the facyory?
Greg
Suggest you give Jim Barker a call at Aviation Resources in Cumberland, WI. Jim can balance anything.
Bob Anderson, CC11-00435, N94RA
First thing to try is taking the prop off, rotating it 180 deg, and putting it back on. You may have already tried this. R
Have not done anything yet. But your idea has crossed my mind. I noticed a log book entry that the prop was changed just after test flight at the factory, probably in a hury because the pilot taking delivery was ready to get going. If the prop is removed will there be any identifing marks that would tell the orientation? I know there is a procedure for this as I have seen mechanics change props on previous planes. Should have paid more attention.
Greg
Your reccomendation paid off! Turns out the same fix is called for in the maintenance manual. Tried it and had instant positive result. Don't quite understand why this would change anything, unless the prop is heavy on one side and the rotating components inside the engine are heavy on the same side, thus compounding the imballance when in the same alignment, then somewhat counteracting the weight imballance when opposed 180deg. still not as smooth as #109 but acceptable for now. Will probably still want to get dynamic ballance done on the prop-engine combination.
Thanks Loads,
Greg