SB00029, letter dated Nov. 20, 2014 from Ms. Schmidt referred to Part A as "required", compliance of Part B as "recommended" actual SB effective date of Sept. 22, 2014 states CC considers Part B "mandatory". Yes, the actual SB is the legal instrument, but just for curiosity sake how is an E-LSA affected by the wording change to "mandatory"?
Are others willing to share the actual costs to comply?
Thanks and Happy New Year,
40M